Forum:Finishing moves

What should be done about them? I'm strongly against them in the main article. As I can imagine it will be similar to Wikipedia articles: mass move lists, with many of the moves being 1-time things or very short term moves. If an idea to shorten the section comes along, then perhaps they could be listed. Something such as "limit the section to a few main finishers, and not the signature moves" as one example. The whole signature moves is speculative anyway, as many of the moves are usually basic moves that many wrestlers regularly use. What does everyone else think? RobJ1981 23:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC)