User talk:Tycio

Archives: /2011, /2012, /2013

Body slam me. +Yc 13:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

=January=

RE:Promotions arts v cats

 * Yes go ahead with that, might sort out the promotions a bit. Dean27 (talk) 12:33, January 24, 2014 (UTC)

Permanent links
Don't necessarily find that these are needed especially for the photo sections. The photos should really just be added (well enough to be representative not necessarily all of them). Also, while I think it'd be nice to always link to the WWE.com article, in certain cases I don't believe it'll be possible. Hence, why we also rely on having Cagematch links to most result pages. I'm not sure if this answers all your questions, if I missed something let me know. - Wagnike2 (talk) 20:26, June 14, 2014 (UTC)


 * I think it's fine to leave a source link for people to later add the images, however, once added they really don't need a source link (and will almost always be deleted if seen) and while I justify the reasoning behind wanting to add a link also for the Videos, I don't think that this is something we should bother doing. We have enough problems with videos that we host on the Wiki.. and truthfully only a small portion of people will actually ever be interested enough to go back and view the videos off WWE.com from here. I don't think it's worth the time or upkeep on our end to have these kinds of links. - Wagnike2 (talk) 20:53, June 14, 2014 (UTC)


 * While I understand your rational and reasoning, the maintenance issues more so come with having unique uniform page layouts that have been decided long ago and need to be adhered to. I'm not saying that your ideas are necessarily poor or unwarranted, but it leads to results pages having different formats for each other and it just gets clunky and unnecessary. Hence, why we need to keep each page as similar as possible and not add those source links. While optimistically, I agree that it'd be nice if people could have that additional wealth of information from our site, I truthfully am not optimistic enough to believe that most people are coming here first and then going to WWE.com, I think it's almost always the opposite. - Wagnike2 (talk) 21:06, June 14, 2014 (UTC)


 * Have you not looked at any of the results pages recently? We are already adding the WWE.com summaries to almost all of them. - Wagnike2 (talk) 21:17, June 14, 2014 (UTC)


 * You can always just give one a try, and then let me know. And we will either go with that format or try to compromise, but eh. Doesn't hurt to at least give it a try. - Wagnike2 (talk) 21:31, June 14, 2014 (UTC)