Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5011123-20170118232952

Just thought I'd throw a topic out there for healthy discussion. The WWE Universal Championship and the WWE United Kingdom Championship are the still the most junior titles in WWE history at this point in time. Question I offer for discussion is this: after the mostly negative reaction from fans and critics during its introduction, is the Universal Championship still a worthy title to keep active? And then the next question applies to the United Kingdom Championship, first introduced during January of 2017 during a title tournament in the WWE's UK tour. By worthy I mean are these titles that are worth keeping in contention? Do you feel either of these championships will ever hold the same prestige and history as previous WWE championships (any past titles you can recall throughout the WWE's history)? Will these two titles in time, hold the same level of history as well be titles that will keep fans interested in seeing who can hold on to the longest or win for the first time in their favorite wrestlers' careers? Your thoughts. 